jump to navigation

Myth Buster – Diesel and Electric Locomotives November 16, 2013

Posted by Ramnath Rangaswamy in India, Indian Economy, Logistics, Railways.
trackback

ImageAre you one of those who believe that;

Electric locomotives are less polluting than Diesel locomotives;

Electric locomotives are technically superior to Diesel locomotives;

Steam locomotives to Diesel locomotives to Electric locomotives is the natural technological progress;

Diesel locomotives deplete our foreign reserves since bulk of the diesel is imported;

If you have answered YES to any of the questions above then please read on. Many misconceptions will be cleared and clarified.

Pollution

When you see diesel locomotive hauling a train you see smoke coming out of the chimney while an electric locomotive chugs along along without any smoke. This would lead you to conclude (wrongly conclude) that diesel locomotive are polluting while electric locomotives are non-polluting.

This is similar to cleaning your house by throwing your garbage out on the road and claiming your house to be clean while complaining that the road is dirty. What does this analogy have to do with Electric locomotives and Diesel locomotives?

To compare like to like, the pollution at the power plant that produces the electricity needs to be compared to the pollution generated by the diesel locomotive.

Based on analysis, the results of the pollutants in gms/ bhp-hr is as below;

Particulate Emission SOx NOx HC CO
Diesel Locomotive 0.45 0.78 10.44 0.02 2.80
Electric Locomotive 0.51 3.38

Source: Diesel Traction – The Environmental Friendly Option ; AK Kathpal, RDSO

url: irsme.nic.in/files/dsl-kathpal.pdf

As the table above shows very clearly and obviously, an Electric locomotive is more polluting than a Diesel Locomotive.

Availability of Electricity

The Indian Railways uses about 11 billion units of electricity per year (or about 1300MW) about 1% of the electricity produced. However, given that India is short of power, by about   14,000 MW, the Indian Railways, if it had electrified only the routes that justified electric traction, could have reduced the shortage of power by about 5%.

5% may seem small but to put in perspective this could have lit up 650,000 homes.

What this electricity shortage also does is encourage use of inefficient diesel generating sets and diesel pumps.

When I say inefficient, I mean inefficient compared to a diesel locomotive on Indian Railways which is micro-processor controlled and which meets Euro 2 or CPA – 2 standards.

This in turn means more imports of crude oil which is then put to in-efficient usage in pumps and diesel generators. Had electrification been limited to the routes justifying electric traction, the electricity shortage would have been less and less number of in-efficient pumps and diesel-generating sets would have been used.

Costing

Is Electric locomotive operations cheaper than Diesel locomotive operations?

Before I answer that question, let me step back. Electric locomotives have a high capital expenditure but a low operations (or running) expense. The capital expense is high because of high initial cost for the equipment ; overhead electric catenary, sub-stations, transformers have to be constructed for electric locomotives to operate. When the traffic is high (Gross Tonne Kilo Metres, GTKM) then it makes economical sense to have electric traction as the capital cost to setup the electric equipment is divided by a larger amount of traffic and the lower running costs justify the investment.

In the Indian Railways context this threshold traffic in GTKM per year was fixed as 47 million GTKM per year. The irony is that only a small % of the electrified routes make the cut according  the criteria. In fact there are routes that have been electrified that have negative ROR!

To explain this concept, let me take an Indian example.

Diesel in India is cheaper than Petrol -why this is so and the vitiated reasons behind this is another story. But diesel cars are more expensive than petrol cars ie, capital cost is high. Maintenance costs of diesel cars is more than petrol cars. Diesel cars are more fuel efficient than petrol cars ie Operating Costs are lower. Given this data, people in India buy a diesel car only when their usage of the car is more than a certain kms/ month or kms/year similar to GTKM on Railways) which justifies a higher capital cost but lower running expenses. What would you call someone who has all this data but buys a diesel car despite not having the minimum usage to justify a diesel car.

Railways across the world which are electrified have a higher operating ratio (ratio of expenditure to earnings)  France: 44% electrified and operating ratio 184%, Italy: 59% electrified and op. ratio 200%, Sweden: 59% electrified and op. ratio 169%, Bulgaria: 63% electrified and op. ratio 325%, Austria: 59% electrified and op. ratio 205%, and Amtrack (USA) is 100% electrified with an op. ratio 146%.

Railways which use diesel traction have lower operating ratios: USA 0.9% electrified and operating ratio – 81%; Canada 0.1% electrified and op. ratio 86%, Australia 9.6% electrified and op. Ratio 89%.

An individual can be excused for making a mistake. But what about the Indian Railways  which has made such a colossal blunder at the cost of the nation.

So how has this wrong decision impacted the Indian Railways and India?

Indian Railways loses an estimated Rs 2000 Cr* (Rs 200 Billion or Euro 2 billion) every year, because of this wrong decision. This Rs 2000 Cr could have been used to reduce freight costs or improve  the railway infrastructure.

*Jal Khambata – Railway’s Electrification Mania

http://www.angelfire.com/in/jalnews/212991.txt

Also from a strategic and security standpoint, why would anyone electrify routes close to the border areas? Sub-stations and overhead wires if destroyed, are more difficult to restore.

What is the reason for this mindless electrification?

Politicians believe that getting electric traction to their constituency can be touted as progress and leveraged for votes. The contracts of maintenance of over head equipment, sub-stations is worth big money and hence there are many vested interests.

So the next time you see a train hauled by an electric locomotive and think of how clean and non-polluting it is, think of all the smoke and pollution from the power plant. And also think of all the unlighted and dark houses who have been robbed of electricity because of this mindless electrification.

Hope this has cleared some of the myths in your mind regarding Electric locomotives and Diesel locomotives.

http://irsme.nic.in/files/CTracSaxena2.pdf

http://www.angelfire.com/in/jalnews/212991.txt

http://irsme.nic.in/files/FACT_RLY_ELC.pdf

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Soham Paul - March 11, 2014

And to add salt to the matter….the IR just fast-tracked its electrification mania recently. Being a diesel fan myself,it came as a bad news anyway. But reading your article made me belief that dieselization or any other diesel blended fuelisation is the way to go. I read somewhere that if an 8MW electric loco is operated,it sucks up power from the national grid by 8MW….however,if it is replaced by a diesel-electric locomotive,it adds 8MW to the national power grid.

2. Darshan Gundawar - December 29, 2014

Very informative article. Its really surprising railway being one of the biggest employers in the world could not find one who could awaken them to the real costing of Diesel Vs Electric Locomotives.. I wish someone from Railway is reading this…

3. Prranjal Shrivaastav - January 2, 2016

Laughable is your judgement. The electricity generated in the power stations is not just for the locos, they supply electricity to the railway stations, it’s campus, loco sheds, loco workshops and other civilian establishments. Suppose we take out the electric locos and run diesel locos in conjunction with the power stations because even if the electric locos are not being operated, other establishments still need electricity. So air pollution thus generated by power stations and diesel locos together are substantially much higher than replacing diesel locos with electric locos and then the only polluting source would be the electricity power station. Over the time coal based power stations will be replaced by nuclear-hydrogen power stations, wind turbines and solar plants, then the pollution can be tackled almost 100% by the said means. I beg you to re evaluate your statement.

Bakshi21 - June 21, 2016

Hey, But what about the future when locomotives are powered by fuel cells? It’s as far away in future as the Nuclear-Hydrogen power stations you talk about. All the overhead power lines will be of no use then, won’t they?

4. logistics - April 1, 2016

Thanks for Sharing your information

Transport & Global Logistics

5. Rajanish Joshi - February 11, 2017

Nice blog. IR has decided to electrify the whole route in next 5 years.It will waste the diesel loco production facility & the modern technology. We will waste the very efficient locos like WDG4D & WDP4D also.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: